Relative weaknesses include Pupil:teacher ratio and Staff development.
The school's overall score (out of 100) is given below. Coloured segments show the contributions of each indicator, explained in more detail below. Hover over the segments for details. Personalise the score by clicking on the button to set your own priorities.
Choose what matters most to you with the menus below. By default, all indicators are set to ‘Relevant’ and are weighted equally in calculating overall scores for each school. Choose ‘Important’ for higher priorities and ‘Unimportant’ or ‘Ignore’ for lower priorities.
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Hover over the circles to see school names; click on them to go the corresponding school pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Click on school names to go their corresponding pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Assistant:teacher ratio:About average. The number of assistants per teacher is about 0.18, which is roughly average compared to other schools.
Staff development:Below average. Reported staff development spend is £221 per teacher per year, which is quite low compared to other schools.
Pupil:teacher ratio:Poor. The number of pupils per teacher is about 45.6, which is very high compared to other schools.
Qualified teachers:There is no qualified teacher information for this school.
Unfilled vacancies:There is no vacancy information for this school.
If you are from this school and have a comment or correction then please write to us: [email protected]