Particular strengths include Staff development and Assistant:teacher ratio. Relative weaknesses include Unfilled vacancies, Qualified teachers and Pupil:teacher ratio.
The school's overall score (out of 100) is given below. Coloured segments show the contributions of each indicator, explained in more detail below. Hover over the segments for details. Personalise the score by clicking on the button to set your own priorities.
Choose what matters most to you with the menus below. By default, all indicators are set to ‘Relevant’ and are weighted equally in calculating overall scores for each school. Choose ‘Important’ for higher priorities and ‘Unimportant’ or ‘Ignore’ for lower priorities.
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Hover over the circles to see school names; click on them to go the corresponding school pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Click on school names to go their corresponding pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Staff development:Excellent. Reported staff development spend is £1211 per teacher per year, which is very high compared to other schools.
Assistant:teacher ratio:About average. The number of assistants per teacher is about 0.85, which is roughly average compared to other schools.
Pupil:teacher ratio:Poor. The number of pupils per teacher is about 23.9, which is very high compared to other schools.
Qualified teachers:Poor. The proportion of qualified teachers is about 94%, which is very low compared to other schools.
Unfilled vacancies:Poor. The proportion of unfilled or temporarily filled teaching positions is 23.5%, which is very high compared to other schools.
If you are from this school and have a comment or correction then please write to us: [email protected]