Powered by SchoolDash
Want to chat? The Schools Guide's AI consultant is here to help
King's Academy Prospect
Cockney Hill, Tilehurst, Reading RG30 4EX
King's Academy Prospect is a non-selective academy. It has 125 staff (about 102 FTEs), including 67 teachers (about 63 FTEs).
This school is a member of King's Group Academies. (Other schools in this trust include King's Academy Binfield, King's Academy Easthampstead Park, King's Academy Brune Park, King's Academy Bay House and King's Academy Ringmer.)
Particular strengths include Unfilled vacancies and Pupil:teacher ratio. Relative weaknesses include Qualified teachers, Staff development and Assistant:teacher ratio.
The school's overall score (out of 100) is given below. Coloured segments show the contributions of each indicator, explained in more detail below. Hover over the segments for details. Personalise the score by clicking on the button to set your own priorities.
Choose what matters most to you with the menus below. By default, all indicators are set to ‘Relevant’ and are weighted equally in calculating overall scores for each school. Choose ‘Important’ for higher priorities and ‘Unimportant’ or ‘Ignore’ for lower priorities.
Important Relevant Unimportant Ignore
Important Relevant Unimportant Ignore
Important Relevant Unimportant Ignore
Important Relevant Unimportant Ignore
Important Relevant Unimportant Ignore

Other schools nearby

Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Hover over the circles to see school names; click on them to go the corresponding school pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Distance
(miles)		 Score Name
0.6Blessed Hugh Faringdon Catholic School
0.8The WREN School
1.8Little Heath School
2.3Denefield School
2.3Kendrick School
2.5Reading Girls' School
2.7Reading School
2.9John Madejski Academy
3.0Highdown School and Sixth Form Centre
3.0Theale Green School
3.3Maiden Erlegh School in Reading
3.4UTC Reading
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Click on school names to go their corresponding pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Unfilled vacancies: Excellent. The proportion of unfilled or temporarily filled teaching positions is 0%, which is very low compared to other schools.
Pupil:teacher ratio: Excellent. The number of pupils per teacher is about 13.2, which is very low compared to other schools.
Assistant:teacher ratio: Below average. The number of assistants per teacher is about 0.18, which is quite low compared to other schools.
Staff development: Below average. Reported staff development spend is £198 per teacher per year, which is quite low compared to other schools.
Qualified teachers: Poor. The proportion of qualified teachers is about 91%, which is very low compared to other schools.
Copyright © 2024 | Last updated 3/6/2024