Particular strengths include Unfilled vacancies. Relative weaknesses include Assistant:teacher ratio, Qualified teachers, Staff development and Pupil:teacher ratio.
The school's overall score (out of 100) is given below. Coloured segments show the contributions of each indicator, explained in more detail below. Hover over the segments for details. Personalise the score by clicking on the button to set your own priorities.
Choose what matters most to you with the menus below. By default, all indicators are set to ‘Relevant’ and are weighted equally in calculating overall scores for each school. Choose ‘Important’ for higher priorities and ‘Unimportant’ or ‘Ignore’ for lower priorities.
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Hover over the circles to see school names; click on them to go the corresponding school pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Overall scores for nearby schools are shown. Click on school names to go their corresponding pages. Use the button on the left to personalise these scores based on your own priorities.
Unfilled vacancies:Excellent. The proportion of unfilled or temporarily filled teaching positions is 0%, which is very low compared to other schools.
Pupil:teacher ratio:Below average. The number of pupils per teacher is about 17.3, which is quite high compared to other schools.
Staff development:Below average. Reported staff development spend is £228 per teacher per year, which is quite low compared to other schools.
Qualified teachers:Below average. The proportion of qualified teachers is about 96%, which is quite low compared to other schools.
Assistant:teacher ratio:Below average. The number of assistants per teacher is about 0.15, which is quite low compared to other schools.
If you are from this school and have a comment or correction then please write to us: [email protected]